Why do I need to use GIMP to batch process?

dear adobe,

 

i'm grinding through thousands of display , template images online retailer. photoshop layering , masks came in quite handy when making templates

but it's got down reusing templates, have elsewhere.

 

1 why every other piece of software on market have batch processing section, , yet hide yours?

 

2. why image processor refuse resize both horizontal , vertical, although claims to? refuses distort image resize, want do. had

to download gimp capability, specify output file , change dpi. these included in gimp not pshop. that. , don't tell

me go actions. may useful things, it's hardly optimal way it, recording exact actions, , saving or not saving, , then

seeing happens. way wanted in gimp, , pathetic 20 years in, pshop still doesnt have credible batch processor, or tell me now.

charge perhaps?

 

3.what has changed in bridge cs6 since cs4? see absolutely nothing different, output still limited pdf , 'web gallery' dysfunctional glob

of code bested jquery, maybe you've impoved end. last experience web gallery dysfunctional i'll stick fixing what's

under hood myself. mean web gallery used flash, else that's not current. let's agree hobbyist option. of course,

i don't know why 'output' might include other options batch processing of files, since batch rename work, guys deciders.

 

4. bad. job has taught me lot of new stuff layering, masks, , functionality of pattern section, have no great qualms with, though,

considering how many companies you've bought, include tons of patterning capabilities used exist in these programs, much

expenditure mgmt. maybe let's fix window views broke in cs4, , call new version.

 

5. forcing me discover gimp, dont ask thing. dont being in there yet, we'll see if changes time. have some

different filters , rendering options adobe could've included years ago gun, again, there's not enough money go around @ adobe.

why?  simple: because don't know how use application.

 

you know, never fails:  stronger rant, greater likelihood of pebkac.

 

in closing, i'd remind you not addressing adobe here in these user user forums.

More discussions in Photoshop General Discussion

adobe